Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias assessment performed with the Quality of Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool

From: Is it time to re-think FAST? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound for initial assessment of abdominal trauma

Risk of bias

Applicability concerns

 

Domain 1: Patient selection

Domain 2: Index text

Domain 3: Reference standard

Domain 4: Flow and timing

Patient selection

Index test

Reference standard

1. Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled?

2. Was a a case-control design avoided?

3. Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions?

1. Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the reference standard?

2. If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified?

1. Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition?

2. Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index?

1. Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard?

2. Did all patients receive the same reference standard?

3. Were all patients included in the analysis?

Catalano [15]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Low

Yes

Catalano [16]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Low

Yes

Catalano [17]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Low

Yes

Lv [18]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Low

Yes

Menichini [19]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Low

Yes

Miele [20]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Low

Yes

Regine [21]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Low

Yes

Sessa [22]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Low

Yes

Valentino [23]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Low

Yes

Valentino [24]

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Yes

High

Low

Yes