Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Costs and effects of interventions targeting frequent presenters to the emergency department: a systematic and narrative review

Study (Yr)

Country

Setting

Number of subjects in the study

Intervention period

Comparator

Crane (2012)

USA

200 bed not for profit hospital.

36 (from initial group of 255)

July 2009–June 2010

Pre and post

DeHaven (2012)

USA

1 ED in Dallas

574 (265 intervention and 309 controls)

April 2003–July 2004

Controls

Edgren (2016)

Sweden

5 counties in Sweden.

Group One used Zelen’s design and had 7280 in intervention group and 3508 in control group. Group two used RCT design and had 934 in intervention group and 459 in control group.

2010- March2014.

Controls

Enard (2013)

USA

Nine Memorial Hermann EDs in the Houston area

13,642 participants (1905 in intervention and 11,373 in control group).

Nov 2008- April 2011

Pre and post

Grimmer-Somers (2010)

Australia

One metropolitan health region

37 patients

18 months from 2007 to 2009

Pre and post

Grover (2018)

USA

ED community hospital with 225 bed hospital in suburban area.

158 in intervention.

Oct 2013- June 2015

Pre and post.

Hardin (2017)

USA

Inner city tertiary hospital. 80,000 annual ED visits.

339 in intervention

Nov 2012-Dec 2015

Pre and post

Lin (2017)

USA

Brigham and Women’s hospital. Large urban acaedemic medical centre

72 (36 in intervention and 36 in control)

Oct 2014-April 2015

Controls.

Murphy (2013)

USA

Regional medical and trauma centre. 644 beds and 80,000 ED visits per yr.

141 (76 extreme and 65 frequent ED users)

Jan 2008- Dec 2010

Pre and post.

Navratil-Strawn (2014)

USA

Patients enrolled in an insurance scheme.

14,140 (7070 participants and an equal number of controls)

June-Nov 2011

Controls.

Okin (2000)

USA

San Francisco General Hospital.

53 patients.

June 1995–June 1996

Pre and post .

Reinius (2012)

Sweden

Karolinska University Hospital with 90,000 visits per yr.

268 patients (211 in intervention and 57 in control group).

Sep 2010- Sep 2011

Controls

Seaberg (2017)

USA

Urban ED with 57,000 presentations per yr.

318 (184 in intervention and 134 controls).

Jan- June 2015

Controls.

Shumway (2008)

USA

San Francisco General Hospital. Sole Level 1 trauma hospital in the county.

252 (167 in intervention and 85 to usual care)

March 1997 to Feb 1999

Controls.

Stokes-Buzzelli (2010)

USA

Urban hospital with 95,000 ED presentations per yr.

36 patients

June 2005–July 2007

Pre and post

Tadros (2012)

USA

One urban hospital.

51 patients

Dec 2006-June 2009

Pre and post

  1. The Evidence Project risk of bias tool [26] showed that the majority of the papers were cohort studies. Five of the studies randomly assigned participants. One study reported on follow up rates, in the other papers follow up was either not applicable because of study design or not reported. The table is included in the Additional file 1