Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of demographic and cardiac arrest related characteristics of 310 study participants

From: Epidemiology and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a developing country-a multicenter cohort study

 

No (%) of Patients

 

Variables

All Patients

Non-EMS

EMS

p-value*

 

(n = 310)

(n = 181)

Ambulance without any life-support (n = 102)

Ambulance with life-support (n = 27)

 

Age (mean ± SE)

59.2 ± 15.1

58.2 ± 14.9

59.2 ± 15.5

65.3 ± 13.2

0.07

Gender

 Male

205 (66.1)

117 (64.6)

71 (69.6)

17 (63.0)

0.65

 Female

105 (33.9)

64 (35.4)

31 (30.4)

10 (37.0)

 

Comorbid conditions

    

0.09

 Cardiac

179 (57.7)

106 (58.6)

58 (56.9)

15 (55.6)

 

 Non cardiac

11 (3.5)

4 (2.2)

7 (6.9)

0 (0)

 Both

23 (7.4)

13 (7.2)

5 (4.9)

5 (18.5)

 None

97 (31.3)

58 (32.0)

32 (31.4)

7 (25.9)

Location of arrest

 Residence

241 (77.7)

146 (80.7)

76 (74.5)

19 (70.4)

0.30

 Public area

69 (22.3)

35 (19.3)

26 (25.5)

8 (29.6)

 

Witnessed arrest

 Yes

288 (92.9)

170 (93.9)

93 (91.2)

25 (92.6)

0.68

 No

22 (7.1)

11 (6.1)

9 (8.8)

2 (7.4)

 

Type of witness

     

 Layperson

284 (91.6)

170 (93.9)

90 (88.2)

24 (88.9)

0.15

 Health care personnel

4 (1.3)

0 (0.0)

3 (2.9)

1 (3.7)

 

 None

22 (7.1)

11 (6.1)

9 (8.8)

2 (7.4)

 

ROSC

 Pre-hospital

1 (0.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (3.7)

0.006

 Hospital

7 (2.3)

4 (2.2)

1 (1.0)

2 (7.4)

 

 No ROSC

302 (97.4)

177 (97.8)

101 (99.0)

24 (88.9)

 

Outcomea(end of ED stay)

 Alive

5 (1.6)

2 (1.1)

1 (1.0)

2 (7.4)

0.04

 Dead

305 (98.4)

179 (98.9)

101 (99.0)

25 (92.6)

 
  1. Abbreviations: EMS emergency medical services, SE standard error, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, ED emergency department
  2. *Shows comparison between Non-EMS, EMS without any life-support interventions and EMS with life-support interventions
  3. aIndicates outcomes on hospital admission